About
CAFC Blog (www.cafcblog.com), an Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP resource, keeps practitioners up-to-date on the most recent IP decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. About Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP For more than...
Authors
The contributors to this blog are Andrews Kurth Kenyon Intellectual Property attorneys from throughout the country. Their backgrounds and areas of concentration allow them to provide comprehensive analyses of recent Federal Circuit Court opinions.  ...

Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey and Alex K. Chu Case: Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc., No. 2011-1191, -1192, -1194, 2012-1070, -1071, -1072 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2013) (precedential). On appeal from E.D. Tex. Before Rader, Lourie, and Daniel. Procedural Posture: Defendants appealed the district court’s 1) partial summary judgment of infringement, 2) denial …

Aristocrat Techs. Austl. Pty Ltd. v. Int’l Game Tech.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey and Alex K. Chu Case: Aristocrat Techs. Austl. Pty Ltd. v. Int’l Game Tech., No. 2010-1426 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2013) (precedential). On appeal from N.D. Cal. Before O’Malley, Bryson, and Linn. Procedural Posture: Plaintiffs (collectively called Aristocrat) appealed the district court’s claim constructions and grant of summary …

In re Dorothy M. Hartman

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey and Michael W. Glynn, Ph.D. Case: In re Dorothy M. Hartman, No. 2013-1070 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2013) (nonprecedential). On appeal from PTAB. Before Newman, Dyk, and Prost (per curiam). Procedural Posture: Inventor, Hartman, appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s judgment affirming the examiner’s final rejection. CAFC …

In re Jeffrey Hubbell

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey and Michael W. Glynn, Ph.D. Case: In re Jeffrey Hubbell, No. 2011-1547 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013) (precedential). On appeal from PTAB. Before Newman, O’Malley and Wallach. Procedural Posture: Inventor, Hubbell, appeals the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences’ judgment affirming the examiner’s final rejection of all pending claims. …

Function Media, L.L.C. v. Kappos

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey and Michael W. Glynn, Ph.D. Case: Function Media, L.L.C. v. Kappos, No. 2012-1380, -1381 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2013) (nonprecedential). On appeal from BPAI. Before Moore, Mayer, and Wallach. Procedural Posture: Function Media, patent owner, appealed the Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences’ decision rejecting Function’s patent claims during …

Disclaimer

Unless otherwise indicated, lawyers listed on this blog are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. A past performance or prior result is no guarantee of a similar future result in another case or matter. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP is responsible for the content of this blog and monitors comments. Andrews Kurth, the Andrews Kurth logo, Straight Talk is Good Business and Intelligent Energy are registered service marks of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP. Andrews Kurth Kenyon and the Andrews Kurth Kenyon logo are service marks of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP is a Texas limited liability partnership. Andrews Kurth Kenyon (UK) LLP is authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales (SRA Registration No.598542). Andrews Kurth (Middle East) DMCC is registered and licensed as a Free Zone company under the rules and regulations of DMCCA. Attorney Advertising. Neither the content on this website and/or blog nor any transmissions between you and Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP through this website and/or blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. In communicating with us through this website and/or blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter that you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers. By commenting on this website and/or blog (and thereby choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval), you understand and agree that Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.