About
CAFC Blog (www.cafcblog.com), an Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP resource, keeps practitioners up-to-date on the most recent IP decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. About Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP For more than...
Authors
The contributors to this blog are Andrews Kurth Kenyon Intellectual Property attorneys from throughout the country. Their backgrounds and areas of concentration allow them to provide comprehensive analyses of recent Federal Circuit Court opinions.  ...

InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey, Hannah Rose Stein, and Michael S. Turner Case: InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, No. 2010-1093 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2013) (precedential). On appeal from the ITC. Before Newman, Mayer, and Bryson. Procedural Posture: Patentee brought action alleging that foreign competitor engaged in unfair trade practice in …

In re Avid Indentification Sys., Inc.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey, Hannah Rose Stein, and Michael S. Turner Case: In re Avid Indentification Sys., Inc., No. 2012-1092 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2013) (non-precedential). On appeal from B.P.A.I. Before Lourie, Clevenger, and Bryson. Procedural Posture: Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences rejected patent claim related to radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags …

In re Chevalier et al.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey, Hannah Rose Stein, and Michael S. Turner Case: In re Chevalier et al., No. 2012-1254 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2013) (non-precedential). On appeal from B.P.A.I. Before Prost, Mayer, and Moore. Procedural Posture: Applicants appealed from examiner’s rejection for obviousness of patent claims covering a device for stirring a liquid …

Accentra, Inc. v. Staples, Inc.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey, Natasha Sardesai-Grant, and Jialin “Chuck” Zhong, Ph.D. Case: Accentra, Inc. v. Staples, Inc., No. 2012 1237, 1264 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 4, 2013) (non precedential). On appeal from C.D. Cal. Before Bryson, Schall, and Moore. Procedural Posture: The jury returned a verdict for Plaintiff on all counts, finding all …

Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp.

Authored by Rose Cordero Prey, Natasha Sardesai-Grant, and Jialin “Chuck” Zhong, Ph.D. Case: Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp., No. 2012 1014 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 2, 2013) (non precedential). On appeal from N.D. Tex. Before Rader, O’Malley, and Reyna. Procedural Posture: Accused infringer defendant appealed district court judgment finding …

Disclaimer

Unless otherwise indicated, lawyers listed on this blog are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. A past performance or prior result is no guarantee of a similar future result in another case or matter. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP is responsible for the content of this blog and monitors comments. Andrews Kurth, the Andrews Kurth logo, Straight Talk is Good Business and Intelligent Energy are registered service marks of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP. Andrews Kurth Kenyon and the Andrews Kurth Kenyon logo are service marks of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP is a Texas limited liability partnership. Andrews Kurth Kenyon (UK) LLP is authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales (SRA Registration No.598542). Andrews Kurth (Middle East) DMCC is registered and licensed as a Free Zone company under the rules and regulations of DMCCA. Attorney Advertising. Neither the content on this website and/or blog nor any transmissions between you and Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP through this website and/or blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. In communicating with us through this website and/or blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter that you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers. By commenting on this website and/or blog (and thereby choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval), you understand and agree that Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.